Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Integrative multi-omics analyses to identify the genetic and functional mechanisms underlying ovarian cancer risk regions

  • AOCS Group
  • , OPAL Study Group
  • , The Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC)
  • University of Cambridge
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • University of Virginia
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation
  • University of California at Irvine
  • Settlement of Lesnoy-2
  • ‘Agii Anargiri’ Cancer Hospital
  • Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg
  • Vanderbilt University
  • Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO)
  • AvMonforte de Lemos
  • Toronto Hospital
  • University of Bergen
  • Hannover Medical School
  • Washington University St. Louis
  • Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute
  • Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute of Oncology
  • Helsinki University Hospital
  • Peter Maccallum Cancer Centre
  • University of Melbourne
  • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
  • German Cancer Research Center
  • University of Hamburg
  • Tianjin Medical University
  • Queensland Institute of Medical Research
  • Westmead Institute for Medical Research
  • Westmead Hospital
  • Colorado School of Public Health
  • University of Calgary
  • University of Sydney
  • University of Utah
  • Dr. Horst Schmidt Klinik GmbH
  • Kliniken Essen-Mitte
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena
  • University of Southampton
  • Imperial College London
  • Demokritos National Centre for Scientific Research
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

To identify credible causal risk variants (CCVs) associated with different histotypes of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), we performed genome-wide association analysis for 470,825 genotyped and 10,163,797 imputed SNPs in 25,981 EOC cases and 105,724 controls of European origin. We identified five histotype-specific EOC risk regions (p value <5 × 10−8) and confirmed previously reported associations for 27 risk regions. Conditional analyses identified an additional 11 signals independent of the primary signal at six risk regions (p value <10−5). Fine mapping identified 4,008 CCVs in these regions, of which 1,452 CCVs were located in ovarian cancer-related chromatin marks with significant enrichment in active enhancers, active promoters, and active regions for CCVs from each EOC histotype. Transcriptome-wide association and colocalization analyses across histotypes using tissue-specific and cross-tissue datasets identified 86 candidate susceptibility genes in known EOC risk regions and 32 genes in 23 additional genomic regions that may represent novel EOC risk loci (false discovery rate <0.05). Finally, by integrating genome-wide HiChIP interactome analysis with transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS), variant effect predictor, transcription factor ChIP-seq, and motifbreakR data, we identified candidate gene-CCV interactions at each locus. This included risk loci where TWAS identified one or more candidate susceptibility genes (e.g., HOXD-AS2, HOXD8, and HOXD3 at 2q31) and other loci where no candidate gene was identified (e.g., MYC and PVT1 at 8q24) by TWAS. In summary, this study describes a functional framework and provides a greater understanding of the biological significance of risk alleles and candidate gene targets at EOC susceptibility loci identified by a genome-wide association study.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1061-1083
Number of pages23
JournalAmerican Journal of Human Genetics
Volume111
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 6 2024

Keywords

  • GWAS
  • epithelial ovarian cancer risk
  • fine mapping
  • functional mechanisms

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Integrative multi-omics analyses to identify the genetic and functional mechanisms underlying ovarian cancer risk regions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this