Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Interdisciplinary perspectives on the development, integration, and application of cognitive ontologies

  • Janna Hastings
  • , Gwen A. Frishkoff
  • , Barry Smith
  • , Mark Jensen
  • , Russell A. Poldrack
  • , Jane Lomax
  • , Anita Bandrowski
  • , Fahim Imam
  • , Jessica A. Turner
  • , Maryann E. Martone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Scopus citations

Abstract

We discuss recent progress in the development of cognitive ontologies and summarize three challenges in the coordinated development and application of these resources. Challenge 1 is to adopt a standardized definition for cognitive processes. We describe three possibilities and recommend one that is consistent with the standard view in cognitive and biomedical sciences. Challenge 2 is harmonization. Gaps and conflicts in representation must be resolved so that these resources can be combined for mark-up and interpretation of multi-modal data. Finally, Challenge 3 is to test the utility of these resources for large- scale annotation of data, search and query, and knowledge discovery and integration. As term definitions are tested and revised, harmonization should enable coordinated updates across ontologies. However, the true test of these definitions will be in their community- wide adoption which will test whether they support valid inferences about psychological and neuroscientific data.

Original languageEnglish
Article number62
JournalFrontiers in Neuroinformatics
Volume8
Issue numberJUNE
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 14 2014

Keywords

  • Annotation
  • Big data
  • Brain science
  • Cognition
  • Integration
  • Mental functioning
  • Neuroscience
  • Ontology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interdisciplinary perspectives on the development, integration, and application of cognitive ontologies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this