Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Interplay between SM precision, BSM physics, and the measurements of αhad in μ-e scattering

  • SUNY Buffalo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Muon electron scattering experiments such as the proposed MUonE experiment offer an opportunity for an improved measurement of the leading-order hadronic running of α, denoted Δαhad. Such a measurement could be utilized to reduce the theoretical uncertainty on the prediction of the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, g-2. Currently, there is a discrepancy between theory and data for this observable, which could potentially be explained by beyond the Standard Model (BSM) physics. Here we investigate the possible impact of missing Standard Model (SM) higher-order corrections and BSM physics on the proposed measurement of Δαhad. In principle, either could be indirectly fitted into Δαhad, causing inconsistencies if used in a g-2 application. The literature suggests a target of 10 ppm on the cross section for the theoretical accuracy. We assess the validity of this target in detail using a variety of methods, finding that a 1 ppm target is a more conservative estimate to ensure that missing higher orders do not dominate the theoretical uncertainty. For the potential BSM contributions, we study various models which contribute first at tree and loop level. Of particular interest is the impact from dark photon models, which can potentially affect the measurement of Δαhad at the desired accuracy. At loop level, there exists in general a kinematic suppression adequate to reduce the BSM contributions to a level which can be neglected for the extraction of Δαhad.

Original languageEnglish
Article number035030
JournalPhysical Review D
Volume100
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 26 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interplay between SM precision, BSM physics, and the measurements of αhad in μ-e scattering'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this