Abstract
Many scholars of political violence conceptualize terrorism as an act of violence and measure each incident accordingly. Dugan and LaFree, co-creators of the largest open-source, action-based terrorism database (The Global Terrorism Database or GTD), provide an outline of the GTD's additive value to the study of terrorism. De la Calle and Sánchez-Cuenca offer an approach based on the control of territory that insurgents hold offers a clear measurement strategy. Victor Asal uses the De la Calle and Sánchez-Cuenca classification schema for sorting out cases that are less cited by conflict scholars. Findley and Young conclude that there are costs associated with each, action-based approaches can lead to overcounting of terrorist events, but that the actor-based approach leads to significant undercounting of terrorist events and exclusion of highly relevant events.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 475-497 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | International Studies Review |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2012 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Killing civilians or holding territory how to think about terrorism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver