Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Latent profile and cluster analysis of infant temperament: Comparisons across person-centered approaches

  • Maria A. Gartstein
  • , Amanda Prokasky
  • , Martha Ann Bell
  • , Susan Calkins
  • , David J. Bridgett
  • , Julia Braungart-Rieker
  • , Esther Leerkes
  • , Carol L. Cheatham
  • , Rina D. Eiden
  • , Krystal D. Mize
  • , Nancy Aaron Jones
  • , Gina Mireault
  • , Erich Seamon
  • Washington State University Pullman
  • University of Nebraska-Lincoln
  • Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro
  • Northern Illinois University
  • University of Notre Dame
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Florida Atlantic University
  • Northern Vermont University
  • University of Idaho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

60 Scopus citations

Abstract

There is renewed interest in person-centered approaches to understanding the structure of temperament. However, questions concerning temperament types are not frequently framed in a developmental context, especially during infancy. In addition, the most common person-centered techniques, cluster analysis (CA) and latent profile analysis (LPA), have not been compared with respect to derived temperament types. To address these gaps, we set out to identify temperament types for younger and older infants, comparing LPA and CA techniques. Multiple data sets (N = 1,356; 672 girls, 677 boys) with maternal ratings of infant temperament obtained using the Infant Behavior Questionnaire-Revised (Gartstein & Rothbart, 2003) were combined. All infants were between 3 and 12 months of age (M = 7.85; SD = 3.00). Due to rapid development in the first year of life, LPA and CA were performed separately for younger (n = 731; 3 to 8 months of age) and older (n = 625; 9 to 12 months of age) infants. Results supported 3-profile/cluster solutions as optimal for younger infants, and 5-profile/cluster solutions for the older subsample, indicating considerable differences between early/mid and late infancy. LPA and CA solutions produced relatively comparable types for younger and older infants. Results are discussed in the context of developmental changes unique to the end of the first year of life, which likely account for the present findings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1811-1825
Number of pages15
JournalDevelopmental Psychology
Volume53
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2017

Keywords

  • Cluster analysis
  • Infant temperament
  • Latent class analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Latent profile and cluster analysis of infant temperament: Comparisons across person-centered approaches'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this