Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Letters of recommendation: Controversy and consensus from expert perspectives

  • SUNY Albany

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

Letters of recommendation (LORs) are a widely used selection tool with many issues associated with their use. To address some of these issues, 575 professionals in personnel-related professions reported their experiences with LORs. We separated items into consensus, polarized, or neither categories. Experts reached consensus that letter inflation is a problem that may never be alleviated and that more weight is placed on letters written by someone the reader knows or from a prestigious institution or organization. Most items were polarized, suggesting substantial controversy in the field regarding LORs. Some items originally polarized reached consensus within profession (academic vs applied). Academic professionals reported using LORs more and placing more weight on their contents than applied professionals. Implications discussed include recommendations for future research and practice, such as the appropriate use of LORs, LOR formats, and training.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)76-91
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Letters of recommendation: Controversy and consensus from expert perspectives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this