Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Managing for climate and production goals on crop-lands

  • Shelby C. McClelland
  • , Deborah Bossio
  • , Doria R. Gordon
  • , Johannes Lehmann
  • , Matthew N. Hayek
  • , Stephen M. Ogle
  • , Jonathan Sanderman
  • , Stephen A. Wood
  • , Yi Yang
  • , Dominic Woolf
  • The Nature Conservancy
  • Environmental Defense Fund
  • University of Florida
  • Cornell University
  • Technical University of Munich
  • New York University
  • Colorado State University
  • Woodwell Climate Research Center
  • Yale University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

The assumption that crop-land natural climate solutions (NCS) have benefits for both climate change mitigation and crop production remains largely untested. Here we model GHG emissions and crop yields from crop-land NCS through the end of the century. We find that favourable (win–win) outcomes were the exception not the norm; grass cover crops with no tillage lead to cumulative global GHG mitigation of 32.6 Pg CO2 equivalent, 95% confidence interval (29.5, 35.7), by 2050 but reduce cumulative crop yields by 4.8 Pg, 95% confidence interval (4.0, 5.7). Legume cover crops with no tillage result in favourable outcomes through 2050 but increase GHG emissions for some regions by 2100. Crop-lands with low soil nitrogen and high clay are more likely to have favourable outcomes. Avoiding crop losses, we find modest GHG mitigation benefits from crop-land NCS, 4.4 Pg CO2 equivalent, 95% confidence interval (4.2, 4.6) by 2050, indicating crop-land soil will constitute a fraction of food system decarbonization.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)642-649
Number of pages8
JournalNature Climate Change
Volume15
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Managing for climate and production goals on crop-lands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this