Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Mandatory second opinion of pathologic slides: Is it necessary?

  • University of Pennsylvania

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

There are many aspects to diagnostic quality assurance in surgical pathology, each with its own specific value. However, in the current era of cost containment, the beneficial aspects of rereviewing pathology slides must be weighed against the resistance of third-party payers to offer reimbursement. Although it is possible that some compromise can be reached, guidelines regarding the second opinion review must be established jointly by clinicians and pathologists.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2198-2200
Number of pages3
JournalCancer
Volume86
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 1999

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mandatory second opinion of pathologic slides: Is it necessary?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this