Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Treatment main effects and matching effects on drinking during treatment

  • J. P. Allen
  • , R. F. Anton
  • , T. F. Babor
  • , J. Carbonari
  • , K. M. Carroll
  • , G. J. Coonors
  • , N. L. Cooney
  • , F. K. Del Boca
  • , C. C. DiClemente
  • , D. Donovan
  • , R. M. Kadden
  • , M. D. Litt
  • , R. Longabaugh
  • , M. Mattson
  • , W. R. Miller
  • , C. L. Randall
  • , B. J. Rounsaville
  • , R. G. Rychtarik
  • , R. L. Stout
  • , J. S. Tonigan
  • P. W. Wirtz, A. Zweben
  • National Institutes of Health

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

236 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: This article examines client drinking and related psychosocial functioning during the course of alcoholism treatment. It focuses on (1) the main effects of the three Project MATCH treatments, (2) the prognostic value of client attributes employed in the matching hypotheses, and (3) the attribute by treatment interaction effects. Method: Clients recruited from outpatient settings (n = 952) or from aftercare settings (n = 774) were randomized to one of the following treatments: Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET), Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Twelve-Step Facilitation (TSF). Alcohol consumption and psychosocial functioning during treatment were assessed at the end of the 12-week treatment phase. Results: During the treatment phase, small but statistically significant differences among treatments were found only in the outpatient arm on measures of alcohol consumption and alcohol-related negative consequences. Forty-one percent (41%) of CBT and TSF clients were abstinent or drank moderately without alcohol-related consequences, compared with 28% of MET clients. Tests of 10 a priori primary client-treatment matching hypotheses failed to find any interaction effects that had an impact on drinking throughout the treatment phase. Conclusions: In the outpatient setting there appears to be a temporary advantage to assigning individuals to CBT or TSF rather than MET. When there is a need to quickly reduce heavy drinking and alcohol-related consequences, it appears that CBT or TSF should be the treatment of choice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)631-639
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Studies on Alcohol
Volume59
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1998

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Treatment main effects and matching effects on drinking during treatment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this