TY - GEN
T1 - Maximizing Coverage over a Surveillance Region Using a Specific Number of Cameras
AU - Sumi Suresh, M. S.
AU - Menon, Vivek
AU - Setlur, Srirangaraj
AU - Govindaraju, Venu
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - An efficient approach to camera deployment enhances the cost-effectiveness and functionality of a multi-camera surveillance network. Traditional camera placement strategies involve maximizing total coverage over a surveillance region with predefined camera locations by optimizing the camera orientations. However, some modern approaches allow users to specify the desired total coverage over the surveillance region, and the algorithms subsequently determine the optimal number of cameras, as well as their exact locations and orientations, to meet this specified coverage. The Reward Penalty Score (RPS) algorithm and Extended Greedy Grid Voting (EGGV) algorithm are two innovative algorithms designed to attain the coverage constraint by proposing an optimal number of cameras and their locations and orientations. In certain scenarios, the number of cameras available for designing the surveillance network is limited, which should be treated as an input constraint rather than a specified coverage requirement. Under such conditions, the primary objective becomes maximizing total coverage with the given number of cameras by determining their optimal locations and orientations. Currently, there are no widely recognized algorithms specifically designed to handle this particular scenario. In this paper, we effectively modify the RPS and EGGV algorithms (m-EGGV and m-RPS), adapting them to optimally deploy the specified number of cameras over the entire surveillance region in an efficient manner to maximize coverage. Additionally, by employing the m-EGGV and m-RPS algorithms, we address the scenario of coverage loss resulting from the failure of one or more cameras. These modified algorithms facilitate the relocation of a subset of potential cameras which can alleviate this loss in coverage caused by the failure of cameras. The m-EGGV and m-RPS algorithms demonstrate a robust performance through extensive testing in diverse simulation environments.
AB - An efficient approach to camera deployment enhances the cost-effectiveness and functionality of a multi-camera surveillance network. Traditional camera placement strategies involve maximizing total coverage over a surveillance region with predefined camera locations by optimizing the camera orientations. However, some modern approaches allow users to specify the desired total coverage over the surveillance region, and the algorithms subsequently determine the optimal number of cameras, as well as their exact locations and orientations, to meet this specified coverage. The Reward Penalty Score (RPS) algorithm and Extended Greedy Grid Voting (EGGV) algorithm are two innovative algorithms designed to attain the coverage constraint by proposing an optimal number of cameras and their locations and orientations. In certain scenarios, the number of cameras available for designing the surveillance network is limited, which should be treated as an input constraint rather than a specified coverage requirement. Under such conditions, the primary objective becomes maximizing total coverage with the given number of cameras by determining their optimal locations and orientations. Currently, there are no widely recognized algorithms specifically designed to handle this particular scenario. In this paper, we effectively modify the RPS and EGGV algorithms (m-EGGV and m-RPS), adapting them to optimally deploy the specified number of cameras over the entire surveillance region in an efficient manner to maximize coverage. Additionally, by employing the m-EGGV and m-RPS algorithms, we address the scenario of coverage loss resulting from the failure of one or more cameras. These modified algorithms facilitate the relocation of a subset of potential cameras which can alleviate this loss in coverage caused by the failure of cameras. The m-EGGV and m-RPS algorithms demonstrate a robust performance through extensive testing in diverse simulation environments.
KW - Camera placement
KW - Coverage optimization algorithms
KW - Greedy search methods
KW - Video surveillance
KW - Visual sensors
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85212300469
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-031-78312-8_20
DO - 10.1007/978-3-031-78312-8_20
M3 - Conference contribution
SN - 9783031783111
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
SP - 303
EP - 320
BT - Pattern Recognition - 27th International Conference, ICPR 2024, Proceedings
A2 - Antonacopoulos, Apostolos
A2 - Chaudhuri, Subhasis
A2 - Chellappa, Rama
A2 - Liu, Cheng-Lin
A2 - Bhattacharya, Saumik
A2 - Pal, Umapada
PB - Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
T2 - 27th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ICPR 2024
Y2 - 1 December 2024 through 5 December 2024
ER -