Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Measuring quality in communication doctoral education using network analysis of faculty-hiring patterns

  • University of California at Davis
  • University of Illinois at Chicago

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

57 Scopus citations

Abstract

This research examines the prestige of doctoral degree programs in communication based on a network analysis of program links among 102 doctoral programs and 2,194 tenure-track faculty members. University of Wisconsin-Madison (Journalism & Mass Communication), Michigan State University (Communication), University of Texas-Austin (Communication Studies), and University of Illinois (Speech Communication) are the top four programs in terms of placement centrality in communication. Centrality of programs in this network, measured by out-degree, closeness centrality, and eigenvector indices, is positively related to subjective prestige ratings of faculty and department chairs (Neuendorf, Skalski, Atkin, Kogler-Hill, & Perloff, 2007). Faculty size was also related to network centrality and interdisciplinarity of program. Further, centrality of programs is positively related to program prestige controlling for faculty size.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)388-411
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Communication
Volume60
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring quality in communication doctoral education using network analysis of faculty-hiring patterns'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this