Abstract
The main methodological issues that should be considered in studies of premenstrual changes are discussed. They include: (1) the selection of well-defined groups of subjects who reflect the diversity of subtypes of premenstrual changes (PMC); (2) the confirmation of retrospective reports through daily monitoring of changes by ratings, or by objective procedures when possible; (3) the need to consider the diversity of premenstrual biological changes instead of comparing average levels, since there is a likelihood that different pathophysiological changes are connected with diverse behavioral and mood changes; (4) application of a multivariate, time-related approach to explore the pathophysiology of PMC; (5) the need to exclude placebo responders prior to the active drug phase in treatment trials and (6) the need for such trials to be double-blind, placebo-controlled and, if possible, of a cross-over design. Attention to such issues should lead to increased consistency of findings across studies and eventually to a better understanding of the pathophysiology of PMC and to a rational, effective treatment.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 15-32 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Psychoneuroendocrinology |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1985 |
Keywords
- Premenstrual syndromes
- behavior
- hormones
- menstrual cycle
- methodology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Methodological issues in studies of premenstrual changes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver