Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Methodological issues in studies of premenstrual changes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

69 Scopus citations

Abstract

The main methodological issues that should be considered in studies of premenstrual changes are discussed. They include: (1) the selection of well-defined groups of subjects who reflect the diversity of subtypes of premenstrual changes (PMC); (2) the confirmation of retrospective reports through daily monitoring of changes by ratings, or by objective procedures when possible; (3) the need to consider the diversity of premenstrual biological changes instead of comparing average levels, since there is a likelihood that different pathophysiological changes are connected with diverse behavioral and mood changes; (4) application of a multivariate, time-related approach to explore the pathophysiology of PMC; (5) the need to exclude placebo responders prior to the active drug phase in treatment trials and (6) the need for such trials to be double-blind, placebo-controlled and, if possible, of a cross-over design. Attention to such issues should lead to increased consistency of findings across studies and eventually to a better understanding of the pathophysiology of PMC and to a rational, effective treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)15-32
Number of pages18
JournalPsychoneuroendocrinology
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1985

Keywords

  • Premenstrual syndromes
  • behavior
  • hormones
  • menstrual cycle
  • methodology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Methodological issues in studies of premenstrual changes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this