Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Microcurrent electrotherapy improves palatal wound healing: Randomized clinical trial

  • Manuela Maria Viana Miguel
  • , Ingrid Fernandes Mathias-Santamaria
  • , Amanda Rossato
  • , Laís Fernanda Ferreira Ferraz
  • , Antônio Martins Figueiredo-Neto
  • , Andrea Carvalho de Marco
  • , Renato Corrêa Viana Casarin
  • , Shannon Margaret Wallet
  • , Dimitris N. Tatakis
  • , Marcio Antonio Mathias
  • , Mauro Pedrine Santamaria
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
  • National Institute of Science and Technology
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Ohio State University
  • Centro Universitário da FEI

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

47 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: This study was conducted to assess the clinical, immunological, and patient-centered outcomes of microcurrent electrotherapy on palatal wound healing. Methods: This was a parallel, double-masked randomized clinical trial, in which 53 patients with ridge preservation indications were selected and randomly assigned to one of two groups. In the control (sham) group (n = 27), palatal wounds, after free gingival grafts (FGG) harvest, received sham application of electrotherapy. In the test (electrotherapy treatment [EE]) group (n = 26), palatal wounds, after FGG harvest, received application of microcurrent electrotherapy protocol. Clinical parameters, patient-centered outcomes, and inflammatory markers were evaluated, up to 90 days postoperatively. Results: The EE group achieved earlier wound closure (P <0.001) and epithelialization (P <0.05; P = 0.03) at 7 and 14 days after harvest when compared with the sham group. Painful symptomatology was reported less frequently in the EE group than in the sham group at 3-day follow-up (P = 0.008). Likewise, an improvement in Oral Health Impact Profile was reported 2 days after the procedure by the EE group (P = 0.04). In addition, favorable modulation of inflammatory wound healing markers occurred when electrotherapy was applied. Conclusion: Within the limits of the present study, it can be concluded that the use of a low-intensity electrotherapy protocol may accelerate palatal wound healing and decrease patient discomfort after FGG harvest.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)244-253
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Periodontology
Volume92
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2021

Keywords

  • electric stimulation therapy
  • gingival recession
  • mucogingival surgery
  • wound healing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Microcurrent electrotherapy improves palatal wound healing: Randomized clinical trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this