Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Mild asymptomatic intrahepatic biliary dilation after cholecystectomy, a common incidental variant

  • Christopher J. Atkinson
  • , Christopher J. Lisanti
  • , Ryan B. Schwope
  • , Daniel Ramsey
  • , Timothy Dinh
  • , Allyson Cochet
  • , Michael J. Reiter
  • United States Army
  • Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of intra- and extrahepatic ductal dilatation in asymptomatic individuals after cholecystectomy. Methods and materials: This IRB-approved retrospective cohort study evaluated the prevalence of intra- and extrahepatic biliary dilation in 77 consecutive post cholecystectomy patients who had CT obtained in the portal venous phase. These were then compared to age and sex matched control patients. Two radiologists in consensus blinded to surgical history evaluated the intrahepatic ducts qualitatively for dilatation. A single radiologist using the best of three orthogonal planes measured the extrahepatic ducts. Extrahepatic ducts were considered dilated if >7 mm plus 1 mm/decade after 60 years. T tests and chi-squared tests were performed. Results: Cholecystectomy patient duct patterns: normal ducts 26% (20/77); intra- and extrahepatic dilation 31.2% (24/77); intrahepatic dilation only 18.2% (14/77); extrahepatic dilation only 24.7% (19/77). Control patient duct patterns: normal ducts 88.3% (68/77); intra- and extrahepatic dilation 2.6% (2/77); intrahepatic dilation only 2.6% (2/77); extrahepatic dilation only 6.5% (5/77). All intrahepatic ductal dilatation was mild. Total intrahepatic dilation: 49.4% (cholecystectomy); 5.2% (control patients). The relative risk of intrahepatic ductal dilation in cholecystectomy patients was 9.5:1. Increased prevalence of intra- and extrahepatic dilation in cholecystectomy patients was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Average extrahepatic duct was 7.8 mm (cholecystectomy) and 5.3 mm (control patients) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Mild intrahepatic biliary dilation in the setting of cholecystectomy is very common, and if not associated with clinical or biochemical evidence of obstruction is likely of no clinical significance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1408-1414
Number of pages7
JournalAbdominal Radiology
Volume42
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017

Keywords

  • Biliary
  • Cholecystectomy
  • Dilatation
  • Intrahepatic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mild asymptomatic intrahepatic biliary dilation after cholecystectomy, a common incidental variant'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this