Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Minimally invasive surgery and cancer: Controversies part 1

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

44 Scopus citations

Abstract

Perhaps there is no more important issue in the care of surgical patients than the appropriate use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for patients with cancer. Important advances in surgical technique have an impact on early perioperative morbidity, length of hospital stay, pain management, and quality of life issues, as clearly proved with MIS. However, for oncology patients, historically, the most important clinical questions have been answered in the context of prospective randomized trials. Important considerations for MIS and cancer have been addressed, such as what are the important immunologic consequences of MIS versus open surgery and what is the role of laparoscopy in the staging of gastrointestinal cancers? This review article discusses many of the key controversies in the minimally invasive treatment of cancer using the procon debate format.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)304-334
Number of pages31
JournalSurgical Endoscopy
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2010

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Immunologic consequences
  • Laparoscopy
  • Minimally invasive surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Minimally invasive surgery and cancer: Controversies part 1'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this