Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Mining exports flows, repression, and forest loss: A cross-national test of ecologically unequal exchange

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

We draw on the theory of ecologically unequal exchange to inform our study of how mining exports sent from poor to rich nations affect forests in poor nations. Using ordinary least squares regression for a sample of 61 low- and middle-income nations, we find little support for this hypothesis. However, we refine it by considering how repressive nations facilitate ecologically unequal exchange in the mining sector. We argue that repressive nations create a "good business climate" for mining companies via economic incentives (e.g., tax holidays) and regulatory concessions (e.g., environmental law exemptions, labor flexibility, and imposed political stability). The key finding is that mining export flows increase forest loss more in repressive rather than democratic nations.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEcologically Unequal Exchange
Subtitle of host publicationEnvironmental Injustice in Comparative and Historical Perspective
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages167-193
Number of pages27
ISBN (Electronic)9783319897400
ISBN (Print)9783319897394
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mining exports flows, repression, and forest loss: A cross-national test of ecologically unequal exchange'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this