Abstract
This paper provides a comparative review of five existing ambient electromechanical mode shape estimation algorithms, i.e., the Transfer Function (TF), Spectral, Frequency Domain Decomposition (FDD), Channel Matching, and Subspace Methods. It is also shown that the TF Method is a general approach to estimating mode shape and that the Spectral, FDD, and Channel Matching Methods are actually special cases of it. Additionally, some of the variations of the Subspace Method are reviewed and the Numerical algorithm for Subspace State Space System IDentification (N4SID) is implemented. The five algorithms are then compared using data simulated from a 17-machine model of the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) under ambient conditions with both low and high damping, as well as during the case where ambient data is disrupted by an oscillatory ringdown. The performance of the algorithms is compared using the statistics from Monte Carlo simulations and results from measured WECC data, and a discussion of the practical issues surrounding their implementation, including cases where power system probing is an option, is provided. The paper concludes with some recommendations as to the appropriate use of the various techniques.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 6299000 |
| Pages (from-to) | 779-787 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | IEEE Transactions on Power Systems |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2013 |
Keywords
- Electromechanical mode shape
- N4SID
- Phasor measurement units (PMU)
- Small-signal stability
- Subspace
- System identification
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Mode shape estimation algorithms under ambient conditions: A comparative review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver