Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Model-free quantification of dynamic PET data using nonparametric deconvolution

  • Columbia University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) data are usually quantified using compartment models (CMs) or derived graphical approaches. Often, however, CMs either do not properly describe the tracer kinetics, or are not identifiable, leading to nonphysiologic estimates of the tracer binding. The PET data are modeled as the convolution of the metabolite-corrected input function and the tracer impulse response function (IRF) in the tissue. Using nonparametric deconvolution methods, it is possible to obtain model-free estimates of the IRF, from which functionals related to tracer volume of distribution and binding may be computed, but this approach has rarely been applied in PET. Here, we apply nonparametric deconvolution using singular value decomposition to simulated and test-retest clinical PET data with four reversible tracers well characterized by CMs ([11C] CUMI-101, [11C] DASB, [11C] PE2I, and [11C] WAY-100635), and systematically compare reproducibility, reliability, and identifiability of various IRF-derived functionals with that of traditional CMs outcomes. Results show that nonparametric deconvolution, completely free of any model assumptions, allows for estimates of tracer volume of distribution and binding that are very close to the estimates obtained with CMs and, in some cases, show better test-retest performance than CMs outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1368-1379
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism
Volume35
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015

Keywords

  • PET
  • binding
  • full quantification
  • model-free
  • singular value decomposition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Model-free quantification of dynamic PET data using nonparametric deconvolution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this