Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Modified constraint induced therapy: A randomized feasibility and efficacy study

  • Stephen J. Page
  • , Sueann Sisto
  • , Peter Levine
  • , Mark V. Johnston
  • , Mary Hughes
  • Kessler Foundation
  • Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, Newark
  • KMRREC

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

155 Scopus citations

Abstract

This case series examined the feasibility and efficacy of a modified constraint induced therapy (CIT) protocol administered on an outpatient basis. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery After Stroke (Fugl), Action Research Arm Test (ARA), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), and Motor Activity Log (MAL) were administered to six patients between 2 and 6 months poststroke (CVA) exhibiting stable motor deficits and learned nonuse of the affected limb. Two patients then participated in half-hour physical and occupational therapy sessions three times/week for 10 weeks. During the same period, their unaffected arms and hands were restrained 5 days/week during 5 hours identified as times of frequent use. Two other patients received regular therapy and two control patients received no therapy. The ARA, Fugl, WMFT, and MAL were again administered after 10 weeks. Patients receiving modified CIT exhibited substantial improvements on the Fugl, ARA, and WMFT, as well as increases in amount and quality of use of the limb using the MAL. Patients receiving traditional or no therapy exhibited no improvements. Results suggest that modified CIT may be an efficacious method of improving function and use of the affected arms of patients exhibiting learned nonuse.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)583-590
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
Volume38
Issue number5
StatePublished - 2001

Keywords

  • Exercise training
  • Motor skills
  • Rehabilitation
  • Stroke

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Modified constraint induced therapy: A randomized feasibility and efficacy study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this