Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

National PM2.5 spatiotemporal model integrating intensive monitoring data and land use regression in a likelihood-based universal kriging framework in the United States: 2000–2019

  • Meng Wang
  • , Michael Young
  • , Julian D. Marshall
  • , Logan Piepmeier
  • , Jianzhao Bi
  • , Joel D. Kaufman
  • , Adam A. Szpiro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Nationwide PM2.5 exposure models typically rely on regulatory monitoring data as the only ground-level measurements. In this study, we develop a high-resolution spatiotemporal PM2.5 model for the contiguous United States from 2000 to 2019 with dense monitoring data at both regulatory and residential sites. Specifically, we combine publicly-available data from 1843 regulatory monitors with our own set of multiple 2-week measurements at 939 residential locations. As we show, these additional data enhance the spatiotemporal prediction capabilities of the model. The model can handle varying data densities and regional variations; it predicts two-week average PM2.5 concentrations at fine spatial scale for the contiguous United States. Cross-validation performance indicates a spatial R2 of 0.93 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.19 (μg/m3), and a temporal R2 of 0.85 and RMSE of 2.05 (μg/m3). Regional spatial R2 ranged from 0.80 (northwest) to 0.93 (northeast and central). Over time, the average PM2.5 across the United Stats decreased from 7.6 μg/m3 in 2000 to 4.7 μg/m3 in 2019. Our model effectively captured local PM2.5 gradients, highlighting its ability to address fine-scale variations related to local sources and roadways.

Original languageEnglish
Article number125405
JournalEnvironmental Pollution
Volume366
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2025

Keywords

  • Exposure assessment
  • Fine particulate matters
  • Fine-scale monitors
  • Spatiotemporal model

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'National PM2.5 spatiotemporal model integrating intensive monitoring data and land use regression in a likelihood-based universal kriging framework in the United States: 2000–2019'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this