Abstract
Because the natural progression of low-gradient aortic stenosis (LGAS) has not been well defined, we performed a retrospective study of 116 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis who had undergone follow-up echocardiography at a median interval of 698 days (range, 371-1,020 d). All patients had preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (>0.50) during and after follow-up. At baseline, patients were classified by aortic valve area (AVA) as having mild stenosis (≥1.5 cm2), moderate stenosis (≥1 to <1.5 cm2), or severe stenosis (<1 cm2). Severe aortic stenosis was further classified by mean gradient (LGAS, mean <40 mmHg; high-gradient aortic stenosis [HGAS], mean ≥40 mmHg). We compared baseline and follow-up values among 4 groups: patients with mild stenosis, moderate stenosis, LGAS, and HGAS. At baseline, 30 patients had mild stenosis, 54 had moderate stenosis, 24 had LGAS, and 8 had HGAS. Compared with the moderate group, the LGAS group had lower AVA but similar mean gradient. Yet the actuarial curves for progressing to HGAS were significantly different: 25% of patients in LGAS reached HGAS status significantly earlier than did 25% of patients in the moderate-AS group (713 vs 881 d; P=0.035). Because LGAS has a high propensity to progress to HGAS, we propose that low-gradient aortic stenosis patients be closely monitored as a distinct subgroup that warrants more frequent echocardiographic follow-up.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 273-279 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Texas Heart Institute Journal |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2014 |
Keywords
- Aortic valve stenosis
- Blood flow velocity
- Calcinosis/complications
- Disease progression
- Echocardiography
- Forecasting
- Prognosis
- Retrospective studies
- Risk assessment
- Stroke volume
- Time factors
- Ventricular function, left
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Natural progression of low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver