Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Occupational risks for lung cancer among nonsmokers

  • Hermann Pohlabeln
  • , Paolo Boffetta
  • , Wolfgang Ahrens
  • , Franco Merletti
  • , Antonio Agudo
  • , Ellen Benhamou
  • , Simone Benhamou
  • , Irene Brüske-Hohlfeld
  • , Gilles Ferro
  • , Cristina Fortes
  • , Michaela Kreuzer
  • , Anabela Mendes
  • , Fredrik Nyberg
  • , Göran Pershagen
  • , Rodolfo Saracci
  • , Giovanni Schmid
  • , Jack Siemiatycki
  • , Lorenzo Simonato
  • , Elise Whitley
  • , Heinz Erich Wichmann
  • Carlos Winck, Paola Zambon, Karl Heinz Jöckel
  • Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology
  • University of Turin
  • Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Registration
  • National Institute of Health and Medical Research
  • Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health
  • International Agency for Research on Cancer
  • Epidemiology Unit Latium Region
  • Regional Health Administration
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • National Research Council of Italy
  • San Camillo Hospital
  • Institut national de la recherche scientifique
  • Venetian Cancer Registry
  • University of Bristol
  • Hospital Viana do Castelo
  • University of Duisburg-Essen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

61 Scopus citations

Abstract

We conducted a case-control study in 12 European study centers to evaluate the role of occupational risk factors among nonsmokers. We obtained detailed occupational histories from 650 nonsmoking cases (509 females/141 males) and 1,542 nonsmoking controls (1,011 females/531 males). On the basis of an a priori definition of occupations and industries that are known (list A) or suspected (list B) to be associated with lung carcinogenesis, we calculated odds ratios (ORs) for these occupations, using unconditional logistic regression models and adjusting for sex, age, and center effects. Among nonsmoking men, an excess relative risk was observed among those who had worked in list-A occupations [OR = 1.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.78-2.97] but not in list-B occupations (OR = 1.05; 95% CI = 0.60-1.83). Among nonsmoking women, there was an elevation of risk for list-A occupations (OR = 1.50; 95% CI = 0.49-4.53), although this estimate was imprecise, given that less than 1% of cases and controls were exposed. Exposure to list-B occupations was associated with an increase in relative risk (OR = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.09-2.63) in females, but not in males. Women who had been laundry workers or dry cleaners had an OR of 1.83 (95% CI = 0.98-3.40). Our findings confirm that certain occupational exposures are associated with an increased risk for lung cancer among both female and male nonsmokers; however, knowledge on occupational lung carcinogens is biased toward agents to which mainly men are exposed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)532-538
Number of pages7
JournalEpidemiology
Volume11
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2000

Keywords

  • Case-control study
  • Gender
  • Lung neoplasms
  • Nonsmokers
  • Occupation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Occupational risks for lung cancer among nonsmokers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this