Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Ofatumumab versus Teriflunomide in Multiple Sclerosis

  • Stephen L. Hauser
  • , Amit Bar-Or
  • , Jeffrey A. Cohen
  • , Giancarlo Comi
  • , Jorge Correale
  • , Patricia K. Coyle
  • , Anne H. Cross
  • , Jerome De Seze
  • , David Leppert
  • , Xavier Montalban
  • , Krzysztof Selmaj
  • , Heinz Wiendl
  • , Cecile Kerloeguen
  • , Roman Willi
  • , Bingbing Li
  • , Algirdas Kakarieka
  • , Davorka Tomic
  • , Alexandra Goodyear
  • , Ratnakar Pingili
  • , Dieter A. Häring
  • Krishnan Ramanathan, Martin Merschhemke, Ludwig Kappos
  • University of California at San Francisco
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • Vita Salute University
  • Fundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia
  • Washington University St. Louis
  • Strasbourg University Hospital
  • University of Basel
  • University Hospital Vall d'Hebron
  • University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn
  • Center of Neurology
  • University of Münster
  • Novartis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

605 Scopus citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Ofatumumab, a subcutaneous anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, selectively depletes B cells. Teriflunomide, an oral inhibitor of pyrimidine synthesis, reduces T-cell and B-cell activation. The relative effects of these two drugs in patients with multiple sclerosis are not known. Methods In two double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 trials, we randomly assigned patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis to receive subcutaneous ofatumumab (20 mg every 4 weeks after 20-mg loading doses at days 1, 7, and 14) or oral teriflunomide (14 mg daily) for up to 30 months. The primary end point was the annualized relapse rate. Secondary end points included disability worsening confirmed at 3 months or 6 months, disability improvement confirmed at 6 months, the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions per T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, the annualized rate of new or enlarging lesions on T2-weighted MRI, serum neurofilament light chain levels at month 3, and change in brain volume. Results Overall, 946 patients were assigned to receive ofatumumab and 936 to receive teriflunomide; the median follow-up was 1.6 years. The annualized relapse rates in the ofatumumab and teriflunomide groups were 0.11 and 0.22, respectively, in trial 1 (difference, -0.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.16 to -0.06; P<0.001) and 0.10 and 0.25 in trial 2 (difference, -0.15; 95% CI, -0.20 to -0.09; P<0.001). In the pooled trials, the percentage of patients with disability worsening confirmed at 3 months was 10.9% with ofatumumab and 15.0% with teriflunomide (hazard ratio, 0.66; P=0.002); the percentage with disability worsening confirmed at 6 months was 8.1% and 12.0%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.68; P=0.01); and the percentage with disability improvement confirmed at 6 months was 11.0% and 8.1% (hazard ratio, 1.35; P=0.09). The number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions per T1-weighted MRI scan, the annualized rate of lesions on T2-weighted MRI, and serum neurofilament light chain levels, but not the change in brain volume, were in the same direction as the primary end point. Injection-related reactions occurred in 20.2% in the ofatumumab group and in 15.0% in the teriflunomide group (placebo injections). Serious infections occurred in 2.5% and 1.8% of the patients in the respective groups. Conclusions Among patients with multiple sclerosis, ofatumumab was associated with lower annualized relapse rates than teriflunomide. (Funded by Novartis; ASCLEPIOS I and II ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02792218 and NCT02792231.)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)546-557
Number of pages12
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume383
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 6 2020

Keywords

  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • Neurology/Neurosurgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ofatumumab versus Teriflunomide in Multiple Sclerosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this