Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

On Trusting Wikipedia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

43 Scopus citations

Abstract

Given the fact that many people use Wikipedia, we should ask: Can we trust it? The empirical evidence suggests that Wikipedia articles are sometimes quite good but that they vary a great deal. As such, it is wrong to ask for a monolithic verdict on Wikipedia. Interacting with Wikipedia involves assessing where it is likely to be reliable and where not. I identify five strategies that we use to assess claims from other sources and argue that, to a greater of lesser degree, Wikipedia frustrates all of them. Interacting responsibly with something like Wikipedia requires new epistemic methods and strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)74-90
Number of pages17
JournalEpisteme
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On Trusting Wikipedia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this