Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Ontogenetic and interspecific organ weight allometry in Old World monkeys

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

The importance of allometry as an analytic tool is well recognized in the literature of primate morphology. However, a number of recent studies have illustrated how interpretive difficulties can arise when researchers confound different types of allometric data. Such confusion is due less to carelessness than to uncertainty about how different types of allometry are related. The present study examines the relationship between two types—ontogenetic and interspecific allometry–in the case of organ weight scaling in six species of Old World monkeys. Accepting the interpretation of interspecific allometry as a reflection of functional scaling constraints, the results of this analysis indicate how ontogenetic patterns have been modified in different‐sized species to maintain compliance with these constraints. Specifically, for the heart and lungs it appears that vertical transpositions of individual species' ontogenies are dictated by isometric interspecific allometry, while in the case of the kidneys and liver, the relation of negative allometry across species entails alteration of the relative growth coefficients of the individual species. While these conclusions can at present only be applied to organ weight scaling, the approach of examining interspecific patterns in light of developmental differences between species should prove very helpful in our efforts to understand the phenomena of size and scaling.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)59-67
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology
Volume64
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1984

Keywords

  • Interspecific allometry
  • Old World monkeys
  • Ontogenetic allometry
  • Organ weights

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ontogenetic and interspecific organ weight allometry in Old World monkeys'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this