Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Optimal character arrangements for ambiguous keyboards

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

64 Scopus citations

Abstract

Many persons with disabilities lack the fine motor coordination necessary to operate traditional keyboards. For these individuals, ambiguous (or reduced) keyboards offer an alternative access method. By placing multiple characters on each key, the size and accessibility of the individual keys can he enhanced without requiring a larger keyboard. Using statistical disambiguation algorithms to automatically interpret each keystroke, these systems can approach the keystroke efficiency (keystrokes per character) of conventional keyboards. Since the placement of characters on each key determines the effectiveness of these algorithms, several methods of optimizing keyboard arrangements have previously been proposed. This paper presents a new method for optimizing an arbitrary set of N characters over a collection of M keys. While earlier efforts relied upon approximations of keystroke efficiency, the proposed approach optimizes the arrangement under this exact performance measure. Applied to the canonical 26 characters on a nine-key 'telephone keypad' problem, this method provides an improvement in efficiency of 2.5 percentage points over previously established layouts. Using only a minimum of calculations, the proposed technique operates quickly and efficiently, deriving optimal arrangements in a matter of seconds using a personal computer. The flexible method is applicable to arbitrary disambiguation algorithms, character sets, and languages.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)415-423
Number of pages9
JournalIEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1998

Keywords

  • Ambiguous keyboard
  • Character prediction
  • Disambiguation
  • Reduced keyboard

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Optimal character arrangements for ambiguous keyboards'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this