Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Package reliability: How can we use ideas/methods from semiconductor reliability in package reliability?

  • Tom Kopley
  • , Scott Pozder
  • , Martin Anselm
  • , Patrick Justison
  • , Matt Ring
  • , Karsten Beckmann
  • , Jeff Siddiqui
  • , Gaddi Haase

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

Are the fields of fracture mechanics, rheology, etc. good enough to address issues In package reliability? No: JEDEC specs all based on DIP wirebond packages. Are we using results from these fields enough or most effectively? Not addressed. Biggest difference with wafer reliability is stressors on chip are local (E-field, temperature), which stressors in a package are mechanical stress, which is resultant of the entire package materials' CTE.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2017 IEEE International Integrated Reliability Workshop, IIRW 2017
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Pages1-5
Number of pages5
ISBN (Electronic)9781538623329
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2 2017
Event2017 IEEE International Integrated Reliability Workshop, IIRW 2017 - South Lake Tahoe, United States
Duration: Oct 8 2017Oct 12 2017

Publication series

NameIEEE International Integrated Reliability Workshop Final Report
Volume2017-October

Conference

Conference2017 IEEE International Integrated Reliability Workshop, IIRW 2017
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CitySouth Lake Tahoe
Period10/8/1710/12/17

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Package reliability: How can we use ideas/methods from semiconductor reliability in package reliability?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this