Abstract
This paper develops individual-specific slope (as opposed to individual-specific intercept) models to account for unobserved heterogeneity in estimating male-female wage differentials. Estimates from these models are compared to traditional OLS, as well as to fixed- and random-effects individual- specific intercept approaches. We find unambiguously that unobserved heterogeneity accounts for about 50% of the male-female wage gap, with individual-specific slope models explaining a slightly smaller proportion of the wage gap. Based on inferences from life-cycle earnings models, we conclude that most individual-specific differences manifest themselves early in one's work career, probably even in the type of schooling received.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 23-42 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Journal of Econometrics |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 1994 |
Keywords
- Discrimination
- Earnings
- Fixed effects
- Gender
- Panel data
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Panel estimates of the gender earnings gap. Individual-specific intercept and individual-specific slope models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver