Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Path complexity in virtual water maze navigation: Differential associations with age, sex, and regional brain volume

  • Ana M. Daugherty
  • , Peng Yuan
  • , Cheryl L. Dahle
  • , Andrew R. Bender
  • , Yiqin Yang
  • , Naftali Raz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Scopus citations

Abstract

Studies of human navigation in virtual maze environments have consistently linked advanced age with greater distance traveled between the start and the goal and longer duration of the search. Observations of search path geometry suggest that routes taken by older adults may be unnecessarily complex and that excessive path complexity may be an indicator of cognitive difficulties experienced by older navigators. In a sample of healthy adults, we quantify search path complexity in a virtual Morris water maze with a novel method based on fractal dimensionality. In a two-level hierarchical linear model, we estimated improvement in navigation performance across trials by a decline in route length, shortening of search time, and reduction in fractal dimensionality of the path. While replicating commonly reported age and sex differences in time and distance indices, a reduction in fractal dimension of the path accounted for improvement across trials, independent of age or sex. The volumes of brain regions associated with the establishment of cognitive maps (parahippocampal gyrus and hippocampus) were related to path dimensionality, but not to the total distance and time. Thus, fractal dimensionality of a navigational path may present a useful complementary method of quantifying performance in navigation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3122-3131
Number of pages10
JournalCerebral Cortex
Volume25
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Keywords

  • Age
  • Brain
  • Fractal dimensionality
  • Hippocampus
  • Spatial navigation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Path complexity in virtual water maze navigation: Differential associations with age, sex, and regional brain volume'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this