Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Patterns of periodontal disease progression based on linear mixed models of clinical attachment loss

  • Ricardo Teles
  • , Kevin Moss
  • , John S. Preisser
  • , Robert Genco
  • , William V. Giannobile
  • , Patricia Corby
  • , Nathalia Garcia
  • , Heather Jared
  • , Gay Torresyap
  • , Elida Salazar
  • , Julie Moya
  • , Cynthia Howard
  • , Robert Schifferle
  • , Karen L. Falkner
  • , Jane Gillespie
  • , Debra Dixon
  • , Mary Ann Cugini
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Forsyth Institute
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • SUNY Buffalo
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • New York University
  • Southern Illinois University
  • Rho, Inc.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

46 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aim: The goal of the present longitudinal cohort study was to examine patterns of periodontal disease progression at progressing sites and subjects defined based on linear mixed models (LMM) of clinical attachment loss (CAL). Materials and Methods: A total of 113 periodontally healthy and 302 periodontitis subjects had their CAL calculated bimonthly for 12 months. LMMs were fitted for each site and the predicted CAL levels used to categorize their progression state. Participants were grouped based on the number of progressing sites into unchanged, transitional and active subjects. Patterns of periodontal disease progression were explored using descriptive statistics. Results: Progression occurred primarily at molars (50% of progressing sites) and inter-proximal sites (72%), affected a higher proportion of deep than shallow sites (2.7% versus 0.7%), and pocketing was the main mode of progression (49%). We found a low level of agreement (47%) between the LMM and traditional approaches to determine progression such as change in CAL ≥3 mm. Fourteen per cent of subjects were classified as active and among those 93% had periodontitis. The annual mean rate of progression for the active subjects was 0.35 mm/year. Conclusion: Progressing sites and subjects defined based on LMMs presented patterns of disease progression similar to those previously reported in the literature.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)15-25
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Clinical Periodontology
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2018

Keywords

  • clinical attachment loss
  • disease progression
  • linear mixed models
  • periodontal disease

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patterns of periodontal disease progression based on linear mixed models of clinical attachment loss'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this