TY - GEN
T1 - Performance analysis of mixed-integer conic and mixed-integer linear unit commitment models
AU - Savasci, Alper
AU - Inaolaji, Adedoyin
AU - Paudyal, Sumit
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 IEEE.
PY - 2020/8/2
Y1 - 2020/8/2
N2 - Computational tractability and scalability are general concerns of Unit Commitment (UC) formulations given the inherent non-convex nature of the problem. Mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) version of UC is very common in modern Energy Management Systems. Lately, mixed-integer second order cone programming (MISOCP) versions of UC are also gaining research attention. To this end, this paper presents a comparative analysis of MILP and MISOCP based UC formulations with and without network constraints. Extensive numerical simulations are performed to investigate accuracy and scalability of MISOCP and MILP UC formulations with several test cases up to 1, 000 generating units. Results show that the MISOCP UC model is generally superior to its MILP counterpart in terms of costs. On the computational time, MISOCP performed superior compared to MILP for large power systems. However, for small systems, MILP UC model performed very similar to MISOCP version in terms of the computational time.
AB - Computational tractability and scalability are general concerns of Unit Commitment (UC) formulations given the inherent non-convex nature of the problem. Mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) version of UC is very common in modern Energy Management Systems. Lately, mixed-integer second order cone programming (MISOCP) versions of UC are also gaining research attention. To this end, this paper presents a comparative analysis of MILP and MISOCP based UC formulations with and without network constraints. Extensive numerical simulations are performed to investigate accuracy and scalability of MISOCP and MILP UC formulations with several test cases up to 1, 000 generating units. Results show that the MISOCP UC model is generally superior to its MILP counterpart in terms of costs. On the computational time, MISOCP performed superior compared to MILP for large power systems. However, for small systems, MILP UC model performed very similar to MISOCP version in terms of the computational time.
KW - DC Power Flow
KW - Mixed Integer Linear Programming
KW - Mixed Integer Second Order Cone Programming
KW - Network-Constrained
KW - Unit Commitment
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85099151559
U2 - 10.1109/PESGM41954.2020.9281466
DO - 10.1109/PESGM41954.2020.9281466
M3 - Conference contribution
T3 - IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting
BT - 2020 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, PESGM 2020
PB - IEEE Computer Society
T2 - 2020 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, PESGM 2020
Y2 - 2 August 2020 through 6 August 2020
ER -