Abstract
• We studied the preferences of physicians and the public as to how physicians should inform a family of a patient’s unexpected death. When the family had to be reached by telephone, 72% of our 150 physician-respondents preferred telling the family that the patient was critically ill and asking the family to come to the hospital immediately (critical notification [CN]); 25% of the physicians preferred announcing the death over the telephone (death notification [DN]). When the news had to be announced in person, 58% of physicians preferred immediately announcing it (IA), and 33% preferred gradual announcement (GA). A Gallup poll commissioned by us showed that 64% of the adult population in the United States preferred CN, 26% DN, 79% IA, and 17% GA; CN and IA were preferred in all the demographic subgroups examined. We discuss our findings, the reasons for them, and their ethical and practical implications.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2029-2033 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Archives of internal medicine |
| Volume | 146 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 1986 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Physicians’ and the Public’s Attitudes on Communication About Death'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver