Power, Connection, and the Endless Present

Published more than a decade ago, Paul Kramer's "Power and Connection: Imperial Histories of the United States in the World" is arguably the most important intervention in the field of U.S. and the World history. This roundtable affirms its standing among modern American historians. Yet the essay's exact influence is hard to characterize. Classic state-of-the-field essays—like Charles Maier's broadside against U.S. diplomatic history or Jacquelyn Dowd Hall's invocation of a long civil rights movement—spurred field-wide reckonings.1 Kramer's impact was subtler. Recently, Daniel Bessner and Fredrik Logevall cited the essay to say that the field should revisit U.S. policy making, using "Power and Connection" as a foil to discuss the limits of the international and transnational turns.2 However, boosters of those turns— Erez Manela and Naoko Shibusawa, among others—ignore "Power and Connection," even as they advance claims about globalization and imperialism that touch on the article's arguments.3 This impasse is as fascinating—as worthy of exposition—as Kramer's original claims, partly because it invites us to historicize the decade just past.