TY - GEN
T1 - Precision and Accuracy Analysis
T2 - 34th International Conference on Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing, FAIM 2025
AU - Greene, Christopher M.
AU - McGrath, Daniel
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2026.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - This study investigates the precision and accuracy of a collaborative robot (cobot) compared to a human operator in a pick and place operation. Through a controlled experiment involving 120 measurements for each operator, the authors analyzed performance using statistical methods including control charts, process capability analysis, and deviation measurements. The experimental design required both operators to place a one-inch cube on a specific target location, with deviations measured in the x and y directions. Results demonstrate that the cobot significantly outperformed the human operator in both precision and accuracy. Control chart analysis showed the cobot maintained statistical control in eight of nine measurements, while the human operator achieved control in only three. Although neither operator met process capability requirements (Cp and Cpk values of 1.0), the cobot’s values were substantially closer. Deviation analysis revealed that the cobot placed the cube within the 0.1 mm specification limits 99.2% of the time, while the human operator succeeded in only 16.7% of trials. This research provides evidence that cobots represent a viable alternative to human operators for tasks requiring high precision and accuracy in manufacturing and service industries, with implications for sectors including pharmaceutical dispensing and electronics manufacturing.
AB - This study investigates the precision and accuracy of a collaborative robot (cobot) compared to a human operator in a pick and place operation. Through a controlled experiment involving 120 measurements for each operator, the authors analyzed performance using statistical methods including control charts, process capability analysis, and deviation measurements. The experimental design required both operators to place a one-inch cube on a specific target location, with deviations measured in the x and y directions. Results demonstrate that the cobot significantly outperformed the human operator in both precision and accuracy. Control chart analysis showed the cobot maintained statistical control in eight of nine measurements, while the human operator achieved control in only three. Although neither operator met process capability requirements (Cp and Cpk values of 1.0), the cobot’s values were substantially closer. Deviation analysis revealed that the cobot placed the cube within the 0.1 mm specification limits 99.2% of the time, while the human operator succeeded in only 16.7% of trials. This research provides evidence that cobots represent a viable alternative to human operators for tasks requiring high precision and accuracy in manufacturing and service industries, with implications for sectors including pharmaceutical dispensing and electronics manufacturing.
KW - Cobots
KW - Collaborative robots
KW - Control charts
KW - Gage R&R
KW - Industry 4.0
KW - Pick-and-place
KW - Process capability
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105020570119
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-032-05610-8_64
DO - 10.1007/978-3-032-05610-8_64
M3 - Conference contribution
SN - 9783032056092
T3 - Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering
SP - 650
EP - 659
BT - Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing
A2 - Srihari, Krishnaswami
A2 - Khasawneh, Mohammad T.
A2 - Yoon, Sangwon
A2 - Won, Daehan
PB - Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
Y2 - 21 June 2025 through 24 June 2025
ER -