Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Preventing Falls Among Older Adults in Primary Care: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation Using the RE-AIM Framework

  • Yvonne A. Johnston
  • , Chelsea Reome-Nedlik
  • , Erin M. Parker
  • , Gwen Bergen
  • , Leah Wentworth
  • , Michael Bauer
  • Broome County Health Department
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI)
  • New York State Department of Health

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Falls are a leading cause of injuries and injury deaths for older adults. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Stopping Elderly Accidents Deaths and Injuries (STEADI) initiative, a multifactorial approach to fall prevention, was adapted for implementation within the primary care setting of a health system in upstate New York. The purpose of this article is to: (a) report process evaluation results for this implementation using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework and (b) examine the utility of RE-AIM for assessing barriers and facilitators. Research Design and Methods: This evaluation used mixed methods. Qualitative evaluation involved semistructured interviews with key stakeholders and intercept interviews with health care providers and clinic staff. Quantitative methods utilized surveys with clinic staff. Process evaluation tools were developed based on the AIM dimensions of the RE-AIM framework. The study was conducted over a 2-month period, approximately 18 months postimplementation, and complements previously published results of the program's reach and effectiveness. Results: Primary barriers by RE-AIM construct included competing organizational priorities (Adoption), competing patient care demands (Implementation), and staff turnover (Maintenance). Primary facilitators included having a physician champion (Adoption), preparing and training staff (Implementation), and communicating about STEADI and recognizing accomplishments (Maintenance). Discussion and Implications: Results revealed a high degree of concordance between qualitative and quantitative analyses. The framework supported assessments of various stakeholders, multiple organizational levels, and the sequence of practice change activities. Mixed methods yielded rich data to inform future implementations of STEADI-based fall prevention.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)511-522
Number of pages12
JournalGerontologist
Volume63
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2023

Keywords

  • Analysis - mixed methods
  • Barriers and facilitators
  • Evaluation
  • Falls
  • STEADI

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Preventing Falls Among Older Adults in Primary Care: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation Using the RE-AIM Framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this