Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Psychological interventions for preventing relapse in individuals with partial remission of depression: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

  • Joost Gülpen
  • , Josefien J.F. Breedvelt
  • , Eva A.M. Van Dis
  • , Gert J. Geurtsen
  • , Fiona C. Warren
  • , Cornelis Van Heeringen
  • , Caitlin Hitchcock
  • , Fredrik Holländare
  • , Marloes J. Huijbers
  • , Robin B. Jarrett
  • , Françoise Jermann
  • , Margo De Jonge
  • , Daniel N. Klein
  • , Nicola S. Klein
  • , S. Helen Ma
  • , Michael T. Moore
  • , Damiaan A.J.P. Denys
  • , J. Mark G. Williams
  • , Willem Kuyken
  • , Claudi L. Bockting
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • King's College London
  • University of Exeter
  • Ghent University
  • University of Cambridge
  • University of Melbourne
  • Örebro University
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • University of Texas at Dallas
  • University of Geneva
  • Arkin Mental Health Institute
  • Department Traumacentre
  • Hong Kong Centre for Mindfulness
  • Adelphi University
  • University of Oxford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Partial remission after major depressive disorder (MDD) is common and a robust predictor of relapse. However, it remains unclear to which extent preventive psychological interventions reduce depressive symptomatology and relapse risk after partial remission. We aimed to identify variables predicting relapse and to determine whether, and for whom, psychological interventions are effective in preventing relapse, reducing (residual) depressive symptoms, and increasing quality of life among individuals in partial remission. This preregistered (CRD42023463468) systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) pooled data from 16 randomized controlled trials (n = 705 partial remitters) comparing psychological interventions to control conditions, using 1- and 2-stage IPD-MA. Among partial remitters, baseline clinician-rated depressive symptoms (p =.005) and prior episodes (p =.012) predicted relapse. Psychological interventions were associated with reduced relapse risk over 12 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-0.84), and significantly lowered posttreatment depressive symptoms (Hedges' g = 0.29, 95% CI 0.04-0.54), with sustained effects at 60 weeks (Hedges' g = 0.33, 95% CI 0.06-0.59), compared to nonpsychological interventions. However, interventions did not significantly improve quality of life at 60 weeks (Hedges' g = 0.26, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.58). No moderators of relapse prevention efficacy were found. Men, older individuals, and those with higher baseline symptom severity experienced greater reductions in symptomatology at 60 weeks. Psychological interventions for individuals with partially remitted depression reduce relapse risk and residual symptomatology, with efficacy generalizing across patient characteristics and treatment types. This suggests that psychological interventions are a recommended treatment option for this patient population.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere50
JournalPsychological Medicine
Volume55
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 17 2025

Keywords

  • Depression
  • Individual participant data meta-analysis
  • Major depressive disorder
  • Mood disorder
  • Partial remission
  • Psychological interventions
  • Quality of life
  • Relapse prevention
  • Residual symptoms
  • Treatment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Psychological interventions for preventing relapse in individuals with partial remission of depression: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this