Publicly funded health care for pregnant undocumented immigrants: Achieving moral progress through overlapping consensus

What just societies owe to non-citizen immigrants is a controversial question. This paper considers three accounts of the require-ments of distributive justice for non-citizens to determine what they might suggest about the provision of publicly funded health care to pregnant undocumented immigrants. These accounts are compared to locate an overlapping consensus on the duty of the state to provide care to pregnant undocumented immigrants. The aim of this paper is not to take a substan-tive position on the “right” prenatal policy, but rather to explore the moral space that this issue occupies and suggest that real moral progress can be achieved through the consistent application of shared values.