TY - GEN
T1 - Quantitative Metrics for Smart Spaces
AU - Mohan, Lakshmi
AU - Menon, Vivek
AU - Jayaraman, Bharat
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 IEEE.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This paper introduces novel quantitative metrics for evaluating the performance of occupant identification and tracking models in multi-building smart spaces. We evaluate two state transition system models: the Centralized State Transition System (CSTS) and the Distributed State Transition System (DSTS). Both are probabilistic models characterized by events, state transition functions, and states. Events abstract biometric recognition, transition functions capture state changes, and states provide the foundation for information retrieval. To systematically compare these models, we introduce two figures of merit, for comparing event-level and state-level behavior, respectively. Experimental results indicate that CSTS outperforms DSTS in their figures of merit, demonstrating greater accuracy, however, DSTS remains a viable alternative in scenarios where building-specific structure and reduced state update complexity offer advantages. Our findings emphasize that both models have their strengths, and also that different scenarios may require different metrics for a more nuanced understanding of system performance and comparison.
AB - This paper introduces novel quantitative metrics for evaluating the performance of occupant identification and tracking models in multi-building smart spaces. We evaluate two state transition system models: the Centralized State Transition System (CSTS) and the Distributed State Transition System (DSTS). Both are probabilistic models characterized by events, state transition functions, and states. Events abstract biometric recognition, transition functions capture state changes, and states provide the foundation for information retrieval. To systematically compare these models, we introduce two figures of merit, for comparing event-level and state-level behavior, respectively. Experimental results indicate that CSTS outperforms DSTS in their figures of merit, demonstrating greater accuracy, however, DSTS remains a viable alternative in scenarios where building-specific structure and reduced state update complexity offer advantages. Our findings emphasize that both models have their strengths, and also that different scenarios may require different metrics for a more nuanced understanding of system performance and comparison.
KW - Camera Networks
KW - Figure of Merit
KW - Identification and Tracking
KW - Performance Evaluation
KW - Smart Spaces
KW - State Transition System
KW - Wide-area Surveillance
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105010828449
U2 - 10.1109/SMARTCOMP65954.2025.00104
DO - 10.1109/SMARTCOMP65954.2025.00104
M3 - Conference contribution
T3 - Proceedings - 2025 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing, SMARTCOMP 2025
SP - 450
EP - 455
BT - Proceedings - 2025 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing, SMARTCOMP 2025
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 11th IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing, SMARTCOMP 2025
Y2 - 16 June 2025 through 19 June 2025
ER -