Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Racial differences in incident genitourinary cancer cases captured in the national cancer database

  • Dylan T. Wolff
  • , Thomas F. Monaghan
  • , Danielle J. Gordon
  • , Kyle P. Michelson
  • , Tashzna Jones
  • , Raymond Khargi
  • , Matthew T. Smith
  • , Fenizia Maffucci
  • , Hyezo Kwun
  • , Nicholas R. Suss
  • , Andrew G. Winer
  • Wake Forest University
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
  • SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University
  • Kings County Hospital Center
  • University of South Florida
  • Yale University
  • Temple University Hospital
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • The University of Chicago

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) captures nearly 70% of all new cancer diagnoses in the United States, but there exists significant variation in this capture rate based on primary tumor location and other patient demographic factors. Prostate cancer has the lowest coverage rate of all major cancers, and other genitourinary malignancies likewise fall below the average NCDB case coverage rate. We aimed to explore NCDB coverage rates for patients with genitourinary cancers as a function of race. Materials and Methods: We compared the incidence of cancer cases in the NCDB with contemporary United States Cancer Statistics data. Results: Across all malignancies, American Indian/Alaskan Natives subjects demonstrated the lowest capture rates, and Asian/Pacific Islander subjects exhibited the second-lowest capture rates. Between White and Black subjects, capture rates were significantly higher for White subjects overall and for prostate cancer and kidney cancer in White males, but significantly higher for bladder cancer in Black versus White females. No significant differences were observed in coverage rates for kidney cancer in females, bladder cancer in males, penile cancer, or testicular cancer in White versus Black patients. Conclusions: Differential access to Commission on Cancer-accredited treatment facilities for racial minorities with genitourinary cancer constitutes a unique avenue for health equity research.

Original languageEnglish
Article number671
JournalMedicina (Lithuania)
Volume57
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2021

Keywords

  • Access
  • Bladder
  • Disparity
  • Kidney
  • NCDB
  • Penile
  • Prostate
  • Race
  • Testicular
  • USCS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Racial differences in incident genitourinary cancer cases captured in the national cancer database'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this