Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: Single institution analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Tubal anastomosis has similar pregnancy rates regardless of approach. Historically, robotic anastomosis has been associated with increased cost and operative time. We sought to perform a contemporary study of these metrics. Methods: One hundred and nine patients were identified who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic tubal anastomosis. Retrospective analysis of medical records was performed. Phone survey was conducted. Results: The mean operative time decreased from 140.7 ± 27.0 min in 2013 to 60.0 ± 9.1 min in 2018, with significant downward trend (p < 0.001). The mean cost was $7153.46 ± $1484.41. The pregnancy rate was 59% (35/59), and tubal patency rate was 81% (42/52). Seventy-two percent of patients under 37 years became pregnant. Conclusions: There is significant improvement in operative time of robotic-assisted tubal anastomosis with surgical experience. Robotic tubal anastomosis outperformed historical metrics of laparoscopy and laparotomy with regard to operative time and cost in this series.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-5
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery
Volume16
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2020

Keywords

  • computer-assisted surgery
  • fertility
  • gynaecology
  • infertility
  • micro surgery
  • minimal invasive surgery
  • obstetrics
  • reproductive systems
  • tubal anastomosis
  • tubal reversal

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Robotic-assisted laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: Single institution analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this