Abstract
Background: Tubal anastomosis has similar pregnancy rates regardless of approach. Historically, robotic anastomosis has been associated with increased cost and operative time. We sought to perform a contemporary study of these metrics. Methods: One hundred and nine patients were identified who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic tubal anastomosis. Retrospective analysis of medical records was performed. Phone survey was conducted. Results: The mean operative time decreased from 140.7 ± 27.0 min in 2013 to 60.0 ± 9.1 min in 2018, with significant downward trend (p < 0.001). The mean cost was $7153.46 ± $1484.41. The pregnancy rate was 59% (35/59), and tubal patency rate was 81% (42/52). Seventy-two percent of patients under 37 years became pregnant. Conclusions: There is significant improvement in operative time of robotic-assisted tubal anastomosis with surgical experience. Robotic tubal anastomosis outperformed historical metrics of laparoscopy and laparotomy with regard to operative time and cost in this series.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-5 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2020 |
Keywords
- computer-assisted surgery
- fertility
- gynaecology
- infertility
- micro surgery
- minimal invasive surgery
- obstetrics
- reproductive systems
- tubal anastomosis
- tubal reversal
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Robotic-assisted laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: Single institution analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver