Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Should pass/fail grading be used instead of traditional letter grades in dental education? Two viewpoints

  • Bruno C. Jham
  • , Dolores Cannella
  • , Shawn Adibi
  • , Kim Austin
  • , Veeratrishul Allareddy
  • , Cynthia S. Petrie
  • , George Tanaka Hawaii

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Discussions about which grading system (letter grade or pass/fail) is more effective in dental education have been occurring for several decades. As more institutions continue to consider the change from the traditional five-tier letter grading system (A/B/C/D/F) to a two-tier grading system (pass/fail), this debate will likely continue. This point/counterpoint article examines arguments for and against each type of grading system, taking into consideration academic performance, learning outcomes, psychological well-being, learning environment, acceptance/performance in postgraduate educational programs, and student motivation. Viewpoint 1 supports the position that a pass/fail system improves learning experiences for dental students, whereas Viewpoint 2 argues that the traditional letter grading system provides for more objectivity and reliability in student evaluation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1258-1264
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of dental education
Volume82
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Keywords

  • Academic performance
  • Assessment
  • Dental education
  • Dental students
  • Educational measurement
  • Grading
  • Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Should pass/fail grading be used instead of traditional letter grades in dental education? Two viewpoints'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this