Abstract
Discussions about which grading system (letter grade or pass/fail) is more effective in dental education have been occurring for several decades. As more institutions continue to consider the change from the traditional five-tier letter grading system (A/B/C/D/F) to a two-tier grading system (pass/fail), this debate will likely continue. This point/counterpoint article examines arguments for and against each type of grading system, taking into consideration academic performance, learning outcomes, psychological well-being, learning environment, acceptance/performance in postgraduate educational programs, and student motivation. Viewpoint 1 supports the position that a pass/fail system improves learning experiences for dental students, whereas Viewpoint 2 argues that the traditional letter grading system provides for more objectivity and reliability in student evaluation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1258-1264 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Journal of dental education |
| Volume | 82 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 1 2018 |
Keywords
- Academic performance
- Assessment
- Dental education
- Dental students
- Educational measurement
- Grading
- Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Should pass/fail grading be used instead of traditional letter grades in dental education? Two viewpoints'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver