Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Side effect management and procedural best practices with indwelling intravesical drug-releasing systems in the treatment of bladder cancer: recommendations from expert panels

  • Benjamin Pradere
  • , Maarten Schuit
  • , Félix Guerrero-Ramos
  • , Shahrokh F. Shariat
  • , Hiroshi Kitamura
  • , Joseph M. Jacob
  • , Yige Bao
  • , John Heesakkers
  • , Kenneth M. Peters
  • , David J. Cahn
  • , Bart De Troyer
  • , Bernardo Herrera Imbroda
  • , David S. Morris
  • , Christopher M. Pieczonka
  • , Qiang Wei
  • , Sumeet Bhanvadia
  • , Robert Somer
  • , Wolfgang Jessner
  • , Spyros Triantos
  • , Cristina Sánchez de Llano
  • John C. Maffeo, Hussein Sweiti, Sarah P. Psutka
  • La Croix du Sud Hospital
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
  • Medical University of Vienna
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
  • Cornell University
  • Al Ahliyya Amman University
  • University of Toyama
  • Sichuan University
  • Maastricht University
  • William Beaumont University Hospital
  • Colorado Urology
  • Sint-Niklaas Moerland
  • Hospital Universitari Virgen de la Victoria
  • Urology Associates
  • Associated Medical Professionals of NY
  • University of Washington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose of review – To provide expert recommendations for side effect management in patients with bladder cancer receiving intravesical-drug releasing system (iDRS) treatment and for optimizing iDRS insertion procedure success.Recent findings – Indwelling iDRS are designed to provide sustained local exposure to therapy. In clinical trials, frequent side effects of iDRS treatment were lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) (e.g., dysuria, pollakiuria, micturition urgency), urinary tract infections (UTIs), and hematuria. These side effects are generally low grade, but if not properly managed, may lead to treatment interruptions or discontinuations. As data are limited, practical recommendations based on expert opinion for the management of common side effects and best practices for iDRS insertion procedures may improve treatment adherence and optimize outcomes in patients with bladder cancer receiving iDRS.Summary – Two separate expert panels were convened to develop recommendations for side effect management with iDRS and optimizing iDRS insertion procedure success. Stepwise treatment-specific management strategies for LUTS, UTIs, and hematuria in patients receiving iDRS treatment that are familiar to practicing urologists are presented, including considerations for continuation or discontinuation of iDRS treatment. Several advanced techniques can be considered to improve iDRS insertions based on variations in patient anatomy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)123-133
Number of pages11
JournalCurrent Opinion in Urology
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2026

Keywords

  • TAR-200
  • bladder cancer
  • gemcitabine intravesical system
  • intravesical therapy
  • intravesical-drug releasing system
  • lower urinary tract symptoms

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Side effect management and procedural best practices with indwelling intravesical drug-releasing systems in the treatment of bladder cancer: recommendations from expert panels'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this