Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Sneer Review

  • SUNY Buffalo

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

To the Editor: The process of reviewing manuscripts for publication places a select few in the powerful position of controlling the fate of most scientific data and, indirectly, the careers of thousands of researchers. However, this process is one of the few areas in science that is not yet standardized or regulated. A process of particular interest to scientists is the manner in which reviewers are selected. A few journals use large, computerized lists, and a handful ask authors for suggestions, but the majority rely on their own editors, some of whom have difficulty keeping up to date and send.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1435
Number of pages1
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume304
Issue number23
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 4 1981

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sneer Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this