Abstract
In this study, using Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) personnel data from 2006 to 2014, we identified seven states with consistently low shortages of highly qualified special education teachers and seven states with persistently high shortages. We employed Guarino et al.’s framework to guide our assumptions and selection of demographic, supply, and demand variables and compared two groups in this descriptive analysis. We found significant differences across supply and demand variables. Low shortage states make greater investments in per pupil expenditures; have higher teacher salaries, generally; have greater preparation capacity; and produce more special education graduates. Taken together, our findings suggest that special education teaching is a relatively better job in low shortage states than in high shortage states. We situate the discussion of our findings within policy recommendations that states may use to address shortages. Limitations of our analysis are addressed, and implications for future research are proposed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 5-23 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Teacher Education and Special Education |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 2021 |
Keywords
- certification/licensure
- educational policy
- fully certified
- special education
- supply and demand
- teacher preparation policy/service delivery
- teacher shortage
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Special Education Teacher Shortage: Differences Between High and Low Shortage States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver