Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Surgical Repair of Bulbar Urethral Strictures: Advantages of Ventral, Dorsal, and Lateral Approaches and When to Choose Them

  • Washington Hospital Center
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University
  • University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

To review the available literature describing the three most common approaches for buccal mucosal graft (BMG) augmentation during reconstruction of bulbar urethral strictures. Due to its excellent histological properties, buccal mucosa graft is now routinely used in urethral reconstruction. The best approach for the placement of such a graft remains controversial. Methods. PubMed search was conducted for available English literature describing outcomes of bulbar urethroplasty augmentation techniques using dorsal, ventral, and lateral approaches. Prospective and retrospective studies as well as meta-analyses and latest systematic reviews were included. Results. Most of the studies reviewed are of retrospective nature and majority described dorsal or ventral approaches. Medium-and long-term outcomes of all three approaches were comparable ranging between 80 and 88%. Conclusion. Various techniques of BMG augmentation urethroplasty have been described for repairs of bulbar urethral strictures. In this review, we describe and compare the three most common "competing" approaches for bulbar urethroplasty with utilization of BMG.

Original languageEnglish
Article number397936
JournalAdvances in Urology
Volume2015
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Surgical Repair of Bulbar Urethral Strictures: Advantages of Ventral, Dorsal, and Lateral Approaches and When to Choose Them'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this