Abstract
We evaluated how variations in sequencing depth and other parameters influence interpretation of chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-seq) experiments. Using Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells, we generated ChIP-seq data sets for a site-specific transcription factor (Suppressor of Hairy-wing) and a histone modification (H3K36me3). We detected a chromatin-state bias: open chromatin regions yielded higher coverage, which led to false positives if not corrected. This bias had a greater effect on detection specificity than any base-composition bias. Paired-end sequencing revealed that single-end data underestimated ChIP-library complexity at high coverage. Removal of reads originating at the same base reduced false-positives but had little effect on detection sensitivity. Even at mappable-genome coverage depth of ∼1 read per base pair, ∼1% of the narrow peaks detected on a tiling array were missed by ChIP-seq. Evaluation of widely used ChIP-seq analysis tools suggests that adjustments or algorithm improvements are required to handle data sets with deep coverage.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 609-614 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Nature Methods |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2012 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic evaluation of factors influencing ChIP-seq fidelity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver