Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Systematic evaluation of factors influencing ChIP-seq fidelity

  • Yiwen Chen
  • , Nicolas Negre
  • , Qunhua Li
  • , Joanna O. Mieczkowska
  • , Matthew Slattery
  • , Tao Liu
  • , Yong Zhang
  • , Tae Kyung Kim
  • , Housheng Hansen He
  • , Jennifer Zieba
  • , Yijun Ruan
  • , Peter J. Bickel
  • , Richard M. Myers
  • , Barbara J. Wold
  • , Kevin P. White
  • , Jason D. Lieb
  • , X. Shirley Liu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

130 Scopus citations

Abstract

We evaluated how variations in sequencing depth and other parameters influence interpretation of chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-seq) experiments. Using Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells, we generated ChIP-seq data sets for a site-specific transcription factor (Suppressor of Hairy-wing) and a histone modification (H3K36me3). We detected a chromatin-state bias: open chromatin regions yielded higher coverage, which led to false positives if not corrected. This bias had a greater effect on detection specificity than any base-composition bias. Paired-end sequencing revealed that single-end data underestimated ChIP-library complexity at high coverage. Removal of reads originating at the same base reduced false-positives but had little effect on detection sensitivity. Even at mappable-genome coverage depth of ∼1 read per base pair, ∼1% of the narrow peaks detected on a tiling array were missed by ChIP-seq. Evaluation of widely used ChIP-seq analysis tools suggests that adjustments or algorithm improvements are required to handle data sets with deep coverage.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)609-614
Number of pages6
JournalNature Methods
Volume9
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic evaluation of factors influencing ChIP-seq fidelity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this