Abstract
Within the critical humanities there has been a recent return to Marxist and communist thought, which has meant a reckoning with post-structuralism. Thinkers, such as José Muñoz and Jodi Dean, who have been critical of parts of the post-structural legacy, have also held onto certain aspects of that tradition, in particular non-coincidence as a stay against identity, administration, and/or determination. However, they have done so in ways that have left unquestioned a contemporary commonsense around teleology. In this essay I argue this has led to an inability to think or maintain connections between the subject and representation – crucial categories for any materialism. Through a discussion of the work of Cuban poet José Lezama Lima, I cultivate a critical vocabulary for building and sustaining non-coincident relations between the subject and representation, ones which neither collapse these two planes nor render them abyssal.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 52-65 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Angelaki - Journal of the Theoretical Humanities |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 2 2018 |
Keywords
- Communism
- Jodi dean
- José lezama lima
- José muñoz
- Post-structuralism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Teleology in the wake of poststructuralism: Non-coincidence in josé lezama lima'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver