Abstract
This article challenges the widely held view that populist mobilization and participatory democracy are incompatible. Ethnographic data from Chávez-era Venezuela show that while populist mobilization cannot directly generate participatory democracy, it can set in motion a process that indirectly leads to this result: By creating but failing to fulfill expectations for participatory democracy and falling short in other ways, a poorly performing local populist regime can precipitate a grassroots backlash that, under certain circumstances, can lead to the election of a post-populist regime with the interest and ability to successfully implement participatory reform. My data show that this can occur in municipalities led by the Left or Center-Right, complicating the idea that successful participatory democracy requires a Left party.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 373-401 |
| Number of pages | 29 |
| Journal | Qualitative Sociology |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 3 2014 |
Keywords
- Left
- Participatory democracy
- Populist mobilization
- Right
- Venezuela
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Crooked Line: From Populist Mobilization to Participatory Democracy in Chávez-Era Venezuela'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver