Abstract
Community-engaged scholars, practitioners, and community partners often find the language of community engagement challenging. Words like participate, collaborate, partner, or engage fail to convey who in a community-university partnership has voice and authority in decisionmaking and responsibility for actions. The Degree of Collaboration Abacus Tool was developed as a visual to address this challenge. The authors provide two case studies to demonstrate how this tool can be used to name steps in community-engaged projects, clarify voice and decision-making authority, and represent collaboration responsibilities at multiple project stages. The Matter of Origins evaluation example illustrates how the tool can be used in a community-engaged research setting. The GRAND Learning Network example demonstrates how the tool can be used in a more complex community-engaged teaching and learning context. In the conclusion, the authors acknowledge the tool's potential limitations and imagine possible adaptations of the tool for other community-university partnership contexts.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 93-107 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| State | Published - 2019 |
Keywords
- Community partner voice
- Community-engaged teaching and learning
- Communityengaged research
- Degree of engagement
- Stakeholder participation
- Visualization tool
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The degree of collaboration abacus tool'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver