Abstract
Each of 12 subjects served in three experimental conditions involving selfmonitoring of respiration, responding on a multiple FI 15″-VI 15″ schedule of reinforcement to produce steady states of lever pressing, and concurrent selfmonitoring and operant conditioning. Lever pressing was always reinforced, selfmonitoring was not. The percentage of self-monitoring errors more than doubled during the concurrent situation compared to self-monitoring alone. Increase in self-monitoring errors was associated with a decrease in response efficiency during VI schedule components. Also, self-monitoring was associated with decreased respiration rates, independent of increased monitoring errors. These results replicate the reactive effects of self-monitoring and indicate the importance of assessing the concurrent environmental demands when using self-monitoring as a treatment or in the evaluation of therapeutic effects.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 89-95 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Behavior Therapy |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1976 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The effects of reinforcing concurrent behavior on self-monitoring'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver